|
|
|
|
|
... |
|
 |
|
|
Cost-Effective Remediation
Alternative
The Problem: To limit its third party
exposure, a contractor purchased Remediation Stop Loss
Coverage from XL Environmental, which also insured its
customer, a company that owned old gas stations. One
of the properties had underground storage tanks that
were leaking severely and in need of remediation. Gasoline
began leaking into the basement of a home near the gas
station property. Our insured put together a cost estimate
to seal off the homeowner’s basement, monitor
the groundwater and get closure from the State.
The Response: The original plan was
to use a pump and treat system to remediate groundwater.
This plan would have exhausted the project budget and
implicated the policy coverage. The contractor, the
claimant and the New Jersey Department of Environmental
Protection met to discuss a less costly course of action.
XL Environmental Claims and the contractor proposed
a plan that did not involve treating the groundwater;
instead, monitored natural attenuation was the cost-effective
alternative. The amount originally proposed for the
pump and treat solution was $350,000 and could have
reached $750,000.
The Benefit:
- XL Environmental Claims’ environmental and
regulatory expertise and swift response controlled
remedial costs.
- The contractor and their client pay only the costs
they had originally intended.
|
|
| |
Back |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|