Losses, Causes And Prevention
The following are three loss scenarios
involving the everyday activities of a chemical distributor.
After the description of the loss, comments are provided
as to the probable cause and precautions that could
have been taken to mitigate or totally prevent such
an occurrence.
Off-Loading Error
In November of 1995, a large wholesale distributor
in West Virginia delivered 10,000 gallons of hydrochloric
acid to a pharmaceutical company. Hours after the delivery,
it was discovered that the product was off-loaded into
the wrong tank causing damage to the tank, connected
piping and other product along interconnected lines.
Expenses for the purging, flushing, and cleaning of
the tank and piping along with compensation for business
interruption exceeded $90,000.
Causes and Precautions: Many factors
contributed to this loss: lack of driver familiarity
with this account, the absence of color-coded piping
and tanks, and the failure of the insured and customer
to adhere to documented standard operating procedures.
All of these were preventable.
New drivers should always spend an orientation period
during which the new driver is teamed with an experienced
driver who is familiar with the customer's route. Color-coding
both piping and tanks is a highly-efficient means of
ensuring the delivery of specific chemicals to dedicated
lines. Standard operating procedures including driver
protocol, customer designation of receptacle for delivery
and customer sign-off of acceptable delivery all could
have helped avoid this loss.
Chemical Burns
In February of 1996, a minor in the state of Pennsylvania
purchased red phosphorus, a known ingredient of pyrotechnics,
from the retail division of a much larger chemical operation.
The young boy proceeded to mishandle the chemical causing
severe burns to over 70 percent of his body and causing
the permanent loss of use of his right hand. An out-of-court
settlement was reached at $840,000.
Causes and Precautions: This loss
was caused by the failure of the sales clerk to exercise
common sense and prudent business judgment. A list of
classified chemicals should always be referred to before
a sale to anyone — especially when age becomes
a question. Release forms should be signed along with
acknowledgment of the dangers of the chemical. Retail
sales should not be handled by "whoever is around;"
a dedicated sales clerk with a background in chemicals
should always be present. Companies should also consider
whether the risk to profit ratio warrants the operation
of a small walk-in retail operation.
Uninsured Loss
In May of 1997, a small distributor of silicone sealer
was named in a suit alleging that fumes from the sealer
had entered the ventilation system of a popular Chicago
restaurant forcing the evacuation and two-day closing
of the establishment. Damages of $160,000 were being
sought. The distributor, relying on vendors coverage
from the manufacturer, did not own a products liability
policy. After putting the manufacturer on notice, the
distributor was dismayed to find that the manufacturer's
insurer denied coverage based on an absolute pollution
exclusion that excluded any loss arising out of the
actual, alleged or threatened discharge of any solid,
liquid, gaseous, or thermal irritant or contaminant
including chemicals. Based on the inadequacy of the
manufacturer's insurance, the vendors coverage was worthless
and the distributor was left with an uninsured loss
of $160,000.
Causes and Precautions: This loss
exemplifies the danger of relying on a manufacturer’s
coverage. Vendors coverage is extremely restrictive
and demands strict attention to quality control, batch
testing and compliance with industry standards. Also,
if a company is going to rely on vendors coverage, certificates
of insurance must be carefully monitored for proper
coverages, expiration dates and acceptability of insurance
carriers. Lastly, be aware that policy exclusions also
pertain to the vendors coverage and limits may have
been reduced by the past claims payments.
|