Site Safety: OSHA And The Design Professional
OSHA Field Inspectors use a document
known as the "Field Inspections Reference Manual"
as guidance in conducting inspections. This manual
notes that at multi-employer worksites, citations
may be given to the exposing employer, the creating
employer, the controlling employer, and the correcting
employer. Following are the definitions of each of
these classifications as well as an explanation of
how a design professional can fit one of these classifications.
Exposing Employer
Simply explained, the exposing employer can be cited
when their employees are exposed to a hazard. This is
the most likely way a design firm could be cited during
an inspection. A typical example would be a field representative
of the design firm entering an unsafe trench as part
of a site visit. The design firm would probably receive
several citations. The most obvious citation would have
to do with the employee in the unsafe trench. Additionally,
the design firm would be cited for inadequate training
because the employee failed to recognize the hazardous
condition. Most employers provide some sort of hazard
communication training to employees, but you must have
documentation to prove the training took place. Otherwise,
in OSHA’s eyes the training never took place.
Controlling Employer
OSHA defines the controlling employer as "responsible,
by contract or through actual practice, for safety and
health conditions on the worksite" with the "authority
for ensuring that the hazardous conditions are corrected."
This situation is likely to occur for a design firm
when acting as a Construction Manager. Usually when
acting as Construction Manager, the design firm is contractually
responsible for the health and safety of all workers
at the site. If the subcontractor’s employees
are acting in an unsafe manner, the subcontractor will
be cited as the exposing employer, while the design
firm will be cited as the controlling employer.
It is also important to note that a key phrase in OSHA’s
definition of controlling employer is "through
actual practice" a design firm can be cited as
a controlling employer. For this reason, it is critical
for project personnel to know what the project contract
states with regard to site safety responsibilities.
Make sure the design firm’s field personnel know
not to overstep their authority when confronted with
safety issues at the project site.
Creating Employer
The creating employer is responsible for creating the
hazardous condition(s). In most cases, a design firm
will not be cited under this classification, as their
role does not usually involve the means and methods
of construction. However, if the design firm is acting
as a Construction Manager, their role might include
directing the manner or timing of the work. In this
role, OSHA possibly would cite the design firm as a
creating employer. Further, if the design firm is acting
as the lead firm on a Design/Build project they are
more likely to be named as a creating employer due to
the increased role of responsibility in creating potentially
hazardous conditions.
Correcting Employer
The correcting employer is responsible for correcting
the hazardous conditions. Typically, the design firm
will not be cited as a correcting employer unless they
are directing means and methods. This would most likely
be applied to a design firm acting as the lead firm
on a Design/Build project. However, depending on the
actions of employees at the project, the design firm
could be cited as a correcting employer if the firm
takes on means and methods responsibilities beyond the
original project scope.
Clearly, a design firm can be exposed to OSHA citations
just by conducting periodic site visits. If your firm
is cited by OSHA, Risk Control can help. Recently, an
insured was cited while acting as a Construction Manager.
OSHA issued five serious violations with fines totaling
$3,000. The citations resulted from unsafe activities
of subcontractors. Risk Control assisted the insured
and the subcontractors to prepare for an "informal
settlement conference" with OSHA, including sending
an Risk Control representative to attend the conference.
As a result of the conference, three of the citations
were thrown out and the remaining two citations were
downgraded to "less-than-serious" with associated
fines of $300. Not only was the insured able to save
$2,700 in fines, but more importantly there were no
longer any serious violations recorded against them.
This is especially important when bidding on government
projects because too many OSHA violations can disqualify
a firm from consideration for the work. If your firm
needs assistance dealing with OSHA citations or other
construction safety issues, call Cyndy Turner at Risk
Control (800-858-0853) for assistance.
OSHA Citation Classifications
Other-Than-Serious – Serious injury or illness
will not likely result from the hazardous conditions
but does have a direct and immediate relationship to
employee safety and health.
Serious – OSHA must prove that there is substantial
probability that death or serious physical harm could
result from the hazard cited.
Repeated – Based upon previous violations where
a substantially similar condition existed.
Failure to Abate – Differs from repeat violations
in that the employer does not correct the hazard within
the time frame delineated in the original citation.
Willful – The result of a deliberate disregard
of OSHA regulations.
Criminal/Willful – When a death is caused by
a firm’s willful disregard of safety regulations.
|